Diller and Scofidio_Home Bodies on Vacation
Early in their text, Diller and Scofidio quote the writings of Jonathan Culler: “one of the characteristics of modernity is the belief that authenticity has somehow been lost and that it can be recuperated in other cultures and in the past.” The authors expand on this idea, pointing out that while tourism (via its production of sights) constructs authenticity, what is “at stake in the issue of authenticity, is the question, whose authenticity?” But is authenticity truly ‘constructed’ or is it only the possibility for authenticity which is created within the tourist mechanism? Is authenticity something which the individual must identify for him of herself through the activation of various possible tourist experiences, or is a given tourist experience inherently authentic? Does tourism serve as a mechanism for the individual tourist, the voyeur, to personally create authenticity, value, and meaning? Furthermore, does tourism serve different purposes cross-culturally? And if so, what are these differences and why do they exist? The authors traveling installation suitCase Studies focuses upon
No comments:
Post a Comment